Results-Based Accountability™ rankings on complexity of language and readability.

Mark Friedman RBA Resources Leave a Comment

Results-Based Accountability™ ranks better than Logic Model, Balanced Scorecard and Six Sigma on complexity of language and readability.

It is hard to find objective evidence that one management, planning or budgeting framework is easier to use than another. Most of what’s out there is anecdotal at best and usually pure self promotion. In the interest of honesty, this site is about promoting Results Accountability as the best available framework. The attached analysis shows that the Results Accountability book, Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough, is significantly better than leading books on Logic Model and Balanced Scorecard, and Six Sigma, when it comes to complexity of language and readability. The field needs a serious comparison of frameworks by a Consumer Reports type organization. But in the mean time, this comparison sheds light on some of what you need to know to make an informed choice.

Download the PDF report here.

Mark FriedmanResults-Based Accountability™ rankings on complexity of language and readability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *